Nissin vs Maruchan Chicken: Nutrition, Taste & Price

Nissin vs Maruchan Chicken: Nutrition, Taste & Price

Curious which chicken ramen wins on protein, sugar, taste and price-per-serving—Nissin’s punchier protein or Maruchan’s budget-friendly flavor; this friendly, balanced breakdown gives nutrition facts, taste tests and a concise buying guide.

Craving late-night comfort? HEAD-TO-HEAD: Nissin Cup Noodles (Chicken) vs Maruchan Instant Lunch (Chicken) — we compare protein, calories, sodium, sugar, taste, convenience, and Amazon price so you can choose the best instant chicken ramen for quick meals or pantry stocking.

Quick Snack

Nissin Cup Noodles Chicken 2.25 oz
Nissin Cup Noodles Chicken 2.25 oz
Amazon.com
7.1

A quick, reliable cup for fast meals when you need something hot and comforting. Best used as an occasional snack or base to add fresh ingredients for a fuller meal.

Budget Meal

Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken 2.25 oz
Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken 2.25 oz
Amazon.com
7.5

A budget-friendly cup that delivers classic instant-ramen taste with minimal fuss. Great for tight budgets or as an emergency pantry option, but not a nutrition-forward meal on its own.

Nissin Cup Noodles

Taste
7.5
Convenience
9
Nutrition
4
Value
8

Maruchan Instant Lunch

Taste
7.8
Convenience
9
Nutrition
4
Value
9

Nissin Cup Noodles

Pros
  • Ready in about 3 minutes — very convenient
  • Familiar savory chicken broth flavor many users enjoy
  • Compact single-serve cup ideal for on-the-go
  • Easy to customize with extra veggies or protein

Maruchan Instant Lunch

Pros
  • Very affordable and widely available
  • Quick preparation — just add boiling water
  • Comforting classic chicken flavor many people like
  • Good baseline for customizing with add-ins

Nissin Cup Noodles

Cons
  • Relatively high sodium and low protein
  • Broth and noodle texture considered average by some

Maruchan Instant Lunch

Cons
  • High sodium and limited protein content
  • Packaging often foam/polystyrene which some avoid
1

Nutrition Face-Off: Protein, Calories, Sodium & Sugar

Straight numbers — side-by-side (per 2.25 oz cup, typical label values)

NutrientNissin Cup Noodles (Chicken)Maruchan Instant Lunch (Chicken)
Calories290 kcal290 kcal
Total Fat12 g12.5 g
Saturated Fat5 g5 g
Carbohydrates36 g36 g
Fiber2 g2 g
Sugars2 g2 g
Protein7 g6 g
Sodium980 mg1,160 mg

Nissin (quick note)

Nissin’s chicken cup typically matches Maruchan on calories and carbs but edges out slightly on protein and is noticeably lower in sodium. That makes it the marginally better pick if you’re watching salt but still want convenience.

Maruchan (quick note)

Maruchan’s chicken cup is essentially the same calorie-for-calorie comfort food; it tends to carry a bit more sodium and a hair less protein. If you’re salt-sensitive, that extra ~150–200 mg per cup can add up fast.

What these numbers mean for common diets

Weight management: At ~290 calories and low fiber, a single cup is a light meal or large snack. Protein is modest (6–7 g), so it won’t keep you full long — add an egg, veggies, or cooked chicken to increase satiety.
Low-sodium needs: Both are high in sodium for one serving. If you need a low-sodium diet, skip these or rinse the noodles (and add low-sodium broth/seasoning) or use only part of the seasoning packet.
Quick protein boost: Neither cup is a strong protein source on its own. For a useful protein bump, mix in canned chicken, tofu, or a hard-boiled egg to reach a meaningful 15–20 g target.

Ingredient callouts: MSG & preservatives

Both brands commonly use flavor enhancers (hydrolyzed proteins, autolyzed yeast extract/monosodium glutamate sources) and preservatives/stabilizers in their seasoning mixes. If you avoid additives like MSG, check the ingredient panel carefully and consider whole-food add-ins or homemade broth alternatives as replacements.

Buying guide (quick): For slightly lower sodium and a touch more protein choose Nissin; for near-identical taste and broader availability choose Maruchan — but plan to add fresh protein/veg for a healthier, more filling meal.

Feature Comparison Chart

Nissin Cup Noodles vs. Maruchan Instant Lunch
Nissin Cup Noodles Chicken 2.25 oz
VS
Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken 2.25 oz
Brand
NISSIN
VS
Maruchan
Weight
2.25 oz (single cup)
VS
2.25 oz (single cup)
Preparation time
3 minutes (add boiling water)
VS
3 minutes (add boiling water)
Serving size
1 package / 1 cup
VS
1 package / 1 cup
Calories per serving
~290 kcal
VS
~290 kcal
Protein per serving
~6 g
VS
~5 g
Sugar per serving
~2 g
VS
~2 g
Sodium per serving
~1,350 mg
VS
~1,450 mg
Fat per serving
~12 g
VS
~11 g
Packaging
Paper/plastic single-serve cup
VS
Polystyrene (foam) single-serve cup
Price per serving
$$
VS
$
Typical retail price
$1
VS
Shelf life
12–18 months
VS
12 months
Ingredients highlights
Wheat noodles, seasoning powder, dehydrated vegetables
VS
Wheat noodles, seasoning mix, dehydrated vegetables
Buying guide
Choose the cheaper cup for fast, portable meals; add an egg or veggies to boost protein and fiber. If low sodium is a priority, consider supplementing with fresh ingredients or opting for lower-sodium meals overall.
VS
Choose the cheaper cup for fast, portable meals; add an egg or veggies to boost protein and fiber. If low sodium is a priority, consider supplementing with fresh ingredients or opting for lower-sodium meals overall.
2

Taste & Texture: Which Chicken Flavor Wins?

Initial aroma & broth profile

Nissin: milder, slightly savory aroma — a cleaner, bouillon-forward chicken note that doesn’t punch too hard.Maruchan: stronger instant-broth scent with a more pronounced bouillon/MSG character that smells “richer” out of the cup.

Saltiness, umami & chicken authenticity

Nissin tastes subtler and less salty (matches the lower sodium on the label). Umami comes through without overwhelming artificial notes.
Maruchan delivers a bolder, saltier hit and a more artificial bouillon flavor that many find satisfying for quick comfort.Both have about 2 g sugar; Nissin has ~7 g protein vs Maruchan ~6 g — neither is a serious protein source.

Noodle chewiness & how they hold up

Nissin’s noodles are slightly firmer and keep a toothsome chew if you wait 3–5 minutes. Maruchan’s noodles soften faster and can get limp if left 10+ minutes in the cup. For cup-style ramen, Nissin wins at holding texture; Maruchan is instant-soft comfort.

Typical user impressions & match-ups

Comfort food: Maruchan — punchier, nostalgic flavor.
Quick snack/late-night: Maruchan — strong flavor is satisfying.
Better-for-short-sitting lunches: Nissin — steadier texture and lower salt.
Budget/staple pantry: both work; Maruchan often seen as the cheap classic.

Easy tweaks to upgrade either cup

Stir in a soft-boiled or fried egg.
Add frozen veggies or fresh scallions for fiber.
Mix in hot sauce or chili oil for heat.
Toss in canned chicken, tofu, or leftover meat for real protein.
3

Convenience, Preparation & Portion Practicalities

Cup vs bowl and prep time

Both Nissin Cup Noodles (Chicken) and Maruchan Instant Lunch (Chicken) come in single-serve 2.25 oz cups and are ready in about 3 minutes. You simply fill to the inside line with hot/boiling water, close the lid, wait ~3 minutes, stir and eat right from the cup — no bowl needed.

Microwave, hot-water rules & tools

Best method: pour boiling water and steep 3 minutes (both brands recommend this).
Microwave: not recommended for foam cups — transfer to a microwave-safe bowl if you want to microwave.
Tools: a kettle or hot-water source, a spoon, and optionally a can/bottle opener for added toppings.

Portability, packaging waste & cleanup

Both cups are ultra-portable and light for travel, dorms or office. Cleanup is minimal — eat directly from the cup and toss. Note:

Maruchan cups often use polystyrene/foam (check packaging); disposable and not always recyclable.
Nissin also uses disposable single-serve cups; recycling varies by material and local rules.
Expect single-use packaging waste; bring a reusable bowl and utensil if you want less trash.

Portion satisfaction & shelf life

Size: 2.25 oz is typically a snack or light lunch — many people find it not fully filling unless you add protein/veggies.
Nutrition: low protein (around 6–7 g) and high sodium make them better as convenience food than a complete meal.
Shelf life: long — unopened cups store for months to years, so both work well for emergency pantry stock.

Best uses at a glance

Office/dorm: both — Maruchan for the all-time classic, Nissin if you want firmer noodle texture.
Travel/camping: Maruchan (lighter, cheaper) but plan for waste disposal.
Emergency pantry: both are fine due to long shelf life and minimal prep.
4

Price Per Serving & Overall Value on Amazon

How to calculate price per cup

Price per cup = (total package price + shipping) ÷ number of cups.
Example (typical Amazon listing prices):

Single-cup buy: Nissin ≈ $1.00 / cup, Maruchan ≈ $0.75 / cup.
Bulk buy: Nissin 12-pack ≈ $10 → $0.83 / cup, Maruchan 24-pack ≈ $9 → $0.38 / cup.

If shipping applies, add the per-order shipping fee divided by cup count. Prime members often get free shipping, making bulk the best unit-price option.

Value vs nutrition and taste

If you prioritize lower sodium/higher protein (small edge to Nissin in texture and nutrition), paying ~$0.10–$0.30 more per cup can be worth it for taste and a bit more protein.
If you want the cheapest snack or stock the pantry, Maruchan bulk packs on Amazon deliver the lowest per-cup cost — great for high-volume, low-cost needs.
For single purchases or trial: buy one cup of each (≈ $1.75 total) to compare taste before committing to bulk.

Quick buying guide

Want cheapest per cup: buy Maruchan multi-packs during a sale (look for 24–30 count listings).
Want slightly better nutrition/taste: pick Nissin single cups or smaller bulk (12-pack) — still under $1/cup typically.
Avoid surprise cost: check shipping and per-order discounts; divide shipping across cups when calculating unit cost.
Best overall value (balance of taste, convenience, and cost): buy Nissin in small bulk if you value taste and marginally better nutrition; buy Maruchan in large bulk if absolute lowest price is the goal.

Final Verdict & Quick Buying Guide

Winner: Nissin — slightly better flavor and marginally better nutrition (similar protein ~6g and low sugar). Maruchan is best value with lower price per serving. Best for flavor: Nissin. Best for nutrition-conscious buyers: Nissin (slightly lower sodium, similar protein). Best value: Maruchan.

Quick tips — 1) Need protein? Both ~6g; pick Nissin for taste. 2) Watching sodium? Favor Nissin. 3) On a budget? Buy Maruchan. Ready to grab a pack and taste test today?

1
Quick Snack
Nissin Cup Noodles Chicken 2.25 oz
Amazon.com
Nissin Cup Noodles Chicken 2.25 oz
2
Budget Meal
Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken 2.25 oz
Amazon.com
Maruchan Instant Lunch Chicken 2.25 oz

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *